A work colleague uses a 3700X and the same board (F51G), his CPU clocks down at least to 2.0GHz.
X1440p civilization v Pc#
On my best friends PC (3600X + MSI MAG x570 something) the CPU clocks down to 1,6GHz automatically.
X1440p civilization v upgrade#
I have a few comparisons due to me having coearthed colleagues and family into having me upgrade their systems to Ryzen as well. The only way to get the clock speeds down is to create a power plan, where the CPU goes down to MAX 2.2GHz (no further, for whatever reason) - which is a less-than-preferable solution, if you'd call it a solution at all.
X1440p civilization v pro#
The CPU sits always at 4,2GHz, temperatures with a BeQuiet! Dark Rock Pro 4 are always in the high 50s while idling/browsing the web. I can't get my Ryzen 3600X to NOT boost at all.I tried playing around with the PStates in the bios and had not a bit of luck with that. So far I've been more than happy, except for one thing: Overall, the Ryzen 5 3600X is an average performer with its 6-cores and 12-threads in this benchmark.Īfter I've made a small detour to the blue team for about 5 years, it was finally time to go back to red last year. AMD's Ryzen 5 3600X notches a small win over the Ryzen 5 2600X, but opens up an impressive lead over the stock Core i5-9600K. The Ryzen 5 3600X yields minor improvements over the similarly-equipped 6-core Ryzen 5 2600X of 5.3%. The Ryzen 5 3600X's performance earns it the 8th place. The Ryzen 5 2600X clearly shows how significantly the mid-range Pinnacle Ridge-based CPUs fall behind the Zen 2 models.
That's a ~5.3% generational speed-up in this title. Again, the Ryzen 5 2600X tumbles down the chart, falling behind its Zen 2-based successor. In this benchmark, the Ryzen 5 3600X has an impressive performance, which is way ahead of the last generation Ryzen 5 2600X by 5.3%. The Ryzen 5 3600X takes a comfortable 3.7% lead over the Core i5-9600K. It is 0.5% lower than the Ryzen 5 3600XT while being 0.2% higher than the Ryzen 5 3600. This increases to $1.17 per frame at 1440p Ultra and even more with 4K Ultra at $1.97 per frame.The Ryzen 5 3600X sits between Ryzen 5 3600XT and Ryzen 5 3600. Pricing this on a frame per frame around the graphics cards original price it will cost $0.p Ultra frame.
To summarise, GeForce GTX 1050 graphics cards can smoothly run this game, but what Civilization V screen resolution would you like to run with? While you can get 76 FPS with 4K Ultra you can increase your frame rate to 128 FPS in Ultra 1440p and up to 168 FPS with 1080p.
Look for a processor like the Intel Core i5-6500 3.2GHz CPU to go with this setup and Ultra is a sure thing. With a system housing a graphics card like the GeForce GTX 1050 and some 4GB RAM, we will see a strong 4K Ultra result in Civilization V. With that performance recorded at 1920x1080 res when running High graphics.Īs this is a relatively powerful GPU, especially when comparing it to Civilization V rec requirements, it would make more sense if you pushed it up to 1440p or 4K, where even at Ultra 4K graphics settings the GeForce GTX 1050 will still get a solid 76 FPS. Viewing the performance found on the 6 year old GeForce GTX 1050 while playing Civilization V we quickly see it can get a very strong 200+ FPS. Low Vs Ultra GeForce GTX 1050 Performance Review
0 kommentar(er)
